Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP Advanced Planning & Optimization (SAP APO)
Viewing all 2068 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Heuristic giving the first bucket a miss

June 24, 2014, 11:03 am
$
0
0

Hi Folks,

 

The issue we are facing is baffling us.

 

We have a Sunday weekly heuristics for products (location heuristics) which doesn't populates any Production planned figure in the weekly bucket imemdiately next to the Frozen Horizon,  instead  it is creating the orders from the 3rd bucket onwards.

 

The settings for these codes had been maintained in the SNP Supply Profile :

 

Profile.JPG

 

We still are wondering why the scheduled background job on Sunday doesn't creates the orders in the 2nd bucket?

 

We understand that first bucket is the Frozen-Horizon due to the Extend SNP Prod. Horizon set to 7 days.

 

But why is it not creating orders in the 2nd bucket.......?

 

However when we run this in interactive mode of through background run at our end, the orders then do get created in the second bucket too!

 

However in the scehduled backrgound run on every Sunday the 2nd bucket is always missed!

 

First bucket missed.jpg

Is there something we could check further?

 

We have been observing this since last 2-3 months @ week.

 

Pls share your feedback.

 

Thx

 

Sooraj

↧
Search

Enhancing Shuffler for SNP planning book - Performance issues

July 1, 2014, 12:05 am
$
0
0

Hello Expert,

 

We have a business requirement to enhance shuffler for SNP planning book to include ‘Production planner’ code, giving schedulers an option to filter location product combinations based on it just like other SAP provided standard fields. To accomplish this, we implemented the BADI: /SAPAPO/SDP_SELECTOR and it works good as long as we use it in dev. Once its moved to quality, we observed performance issues and it takes almost indefinite time to hit the relevant methods of this BADI(due to the large number of combinations). The option to utilize freely-definable attributes  is also not available as they have already been exhausted for some other purposes.

 

Would like to know if you have faced something similar in the past and found some feasible solution to it. Any inputs around this will really be appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Rajat

↧
↧

Add Production (Confirmed) Key Figure to capacity view

July 1, 2014, 9:45 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have been trying to add production (confirmed) to our capacity view for the following functionality

 

- show capacity consumption for process orders/event orders.... order category 'AA'

- show details about process orders within the capacity view

- ability to show graphical output for process orders/planned orders

 

I have tried both using the standard KF and creating a customer KF and adding to relevant planning book/data view - adding to the aggregates for resources, checking the category group to include process orders. The solution has partially worked but the issue is that details for the KF will not show in the view - but when we go to standard product/location views details are available.

 

Additional information

 

- Key Figure is order series

- Key Figure has custom category group Z*

- Key Figure is quantity type, with unit/currency = 0Unit

 

 

Please provide some help or advice about potential solution options - or what we should explore further:

 

Thanks SAP-APO Gurus!

↧

Days supply shows incorrect results when selection profile is loaded

July 1, 2014, 8:20 am
$
0
0

Days of Supply works perfectly in CTM planning book when individual product & location is selected. But, if selection profile is loaded and then drill down to individual product & location happens, "Days of Supply" does not show correct results. We have copied standard macro from 9ACTM02/CTM02(1) Planning Book/DataView. All settings of Days of supply, Determine Workdays are same as standard CTM & SNP macros. I followed all steps used in following thread:Days supply is not populating in the planning book

but still selection profile is not giving correct results. There should not be any difference in Days of Supply when individually selected by Product and Location or via selection profile drill down to product & location level. Standard CTM planning book works perfect even when selection profile is loaded. Not sure if I have missed out anything even though I matched all macros and related settings with standard macros. Please advise.

↧

BAPI_STSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI2 : Got stuck :(

November 13, 2007, 10:40 am
$
0
0

Hi Frns,

 

When trying to execute the BAPI "BAPI_STSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI2", its asking me for a stock type and ATP cat type...

 

What should i enter in these fields... i just want to create a stock, which can be used for furthur planning in SNP...

 

I got stuck up here... Please reply as soon as possible..

 

 

Thanks

Kris

↧
↧

UOM issue

June 23, 2014, 9:01 am
$
0
0

LAST MONTH.pngThis is the Backend PB when checked last month, Total  Unit was PC but in detail it was showing WAF. Checked in MAT1 in Unit of measure tab which is updated 1 pc =  2380 waf , now its showing perfectly fine. No changes made though. Please advise what could be the reason for this. when tried to check product in detail it was showing error for a product

 

"Conversion from WAF to PC for product ****** is not possible

Message no. /SAPAPO/SNP044"

↧

Save planning result of DS board into simulation version

July 2, 2014, 2:00 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

With our planning process, there are several steps from the beginning to the end. For example,

 

Step1: set fixing interval

Step2: deallocated all orders

Step3: run optimizer for 1 worksop

Step4: run optimizer for another workshop

......

 

As all these steps done, we could have a completed detailed schedule result for whole prodcution plant.

So what we want to have is :

As step1 done, system save the resut into "simuation verison 1"

Step2 should run based be the result of step1 (simulation verion 1), as it done, it should aslo save the result into "simuation verison 1"

Step3 should run based be the result of step2 (simulation verion 1), as it done, it should aslo save the result into "simuation verison 1"

....

Finally, we could see the final planning result in "simulation version 1", then our planners will check the result and decide whether to adopt or not.

 

It's the idea, but after step1, system will give us an error as picture shows " A simulation version with this name already exists".

 

Could you plz help to advice how to realize our objectives.

Untitled.png

Untitled.png

↧

Understanding CTM application log

July 2, 2014, 7:59 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I want to understand the CTM application log created after planning run. The CTM application log contains following columns in a table view:

1. Total Demand Qty

2. Timely qty

3. Delayed qty

4. Category - Forecast DR, Sales order SR etc

 

when i try to match the total demand qty against the category (SR i.e. safety stock) with planning book safety stock qty, it did not match.

For example, in application log if i could see that total demand qty against category SR(Safety stock) is equal to 2000, when i go and check in planning book i found that across planning horizon safety stock maintained is summed up only to 1000 in weekly bucket.

 

I want to understand from how CTM is generated application log to give demand category of safety stock as Total Demand qty of 2000, even if in planning book if i sum up time series qty of safety stock as a demand in across planning horizon it sums up to only 1000.

How CTM calculates the total demand qty and other qty such as timely and delayed qty in a application log.

Please reply soon, i will award points on reply.

 

Regards

Gajendra

↧
Search

If the Tlane is blocked in APO.. Will the changes cif from R/3 to APO for tlane??

July 2, 2014, 7:42 pm
$
0
0

If the Tlane is blocked in APO.. Will the changes cif from R/3 to APO for tlane??

↧
↧

Initial column DP

June 30, 2014, 7:27 am
$
0
0

Dear,

 

I use the initial column in the DP planning book for a few sum calculations.

 

I dont want this column to appear in the Graphic, but I cannot find the way to keep the Incitial colum in the table, AND hide it in the graphic view.

Is there a way to do it ?

 

Thanks

 

PE

↧

CIF Issue

July 3, 2014, 8:42 am
$
0
0

Hi Guys,

 

We are getting a issue with our CIF job to send Material Master data from R3 to APO.

 

A supply profile is blocking the transfer, which is actually not maintained in APO.

 

Any idea what can be the reason and what can be done here.

 

Thanks in Advance.

↧

BOP Result: Layout Change

May 14, 2012, 6:29 am
$
0
0

Hi SAP-Experts,

I am an end-user and part of customer service dep. I am responsible for BOP_RESULT.

For my daily work the layout is inconvenient (depending on the BOP the result of 1 material is sometimes displayed in 2 or mores lines) even if I export it to Excel.

Now I am looking for a layout where all informations concering the material are in 1 line.

 

So does someone of you know if it's possible to customize the layout or is it only possible to change it with coding?

 

Thanks

novize

↧

Upgrade to SCM 7.0

June 30, 2009, 5:01 am
↧
↧

SPP - Approval Deviation formula

July 7, 2014, 7:07 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

I can not find out the formula used for deviation in Approval process (tansaction /N/SAPAPO/SPPFCSTAPPR).

 

Thanks,

Mauro.

↧

How to integrate Quotation Data for In House Production to APO from R/3

July 8, 2014, 1:47 am
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

I m tring to use Function module "BAPI_QTASRVAPS_SAVEMULTI2" to integrate Inhouse Procured Material Quotation data from R/3 to APOI m filling Quota Item PDS:

 

MODEL                          xxx

PLANNING_VERSION

LOCATION_ID

LOCATION                       xxxx

LOCTYPE                        xxxx

LOCATION_INT                   xxxx

PRODUCT_ID

PRODUCT                        xxxx

PRODUCT_INT                    xxxx

DIRECTION                      x

VAL_FROM                       20.120.316.000.000

VAL_TO                         99.991.231.235.959

PDS_NAME                       xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

QUOTA_ARRANGEMENT              50,00

QUOTA_BASE_QUANTITY                          0,000

HEURISTIC_ID

 

and Quota Item PDS_X

MODEL                          YYY

PLANNING_VERSION

LOCATION_ID

LOCATION                       YYYY

LOCTYPE                        YYYY

LOCATION_INT                  YYYY

PRODUCT_ID

PRODUCT                        YYYY

PRODUCT_INT                    YYY

DIRECTION                      YY

VAL_FROM                       YYY

VAL_TO                         YYY

PDS_NAME                       YYYY

QUOTA_ARRANGEMENT         X

QUOTA_BASE_QUANTITY

HEURISTIC_ID

 

However I get the error:

E /SAPAPO/OO_TR        425 iPPE not found in the database or the table

 

Does anybody know how to solve or use it?

Thanks in advance...

↧
Search

How to add input check on custom fields in /SAPAPO/MAT1

July 8, 2014, 7:58 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I've added some custom fields in transaction /SAPAPO/MAT1, they're in /SAPAPO/MATKEY-ATT01-05.

 

Now I want to add an input check on those fields because they can only have certain values (i.e. FIELD /SAPAPO/MATIO-ATT03 MODULE xxx).

 

How can I do this?

 

Tia,

 

Filip.

↧

Fiscal year to normal calender days

July 8, 2014, 10:57 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Here is the requirement from the client that, to change the calender from existing fiscal year to normal calender days. So please suggest me what will be the effects of changed it in SAP APO DP.

 

Thanking in advance.

↧
↧

CTM explanation tool

February 25, 2014, 9:42 am
$
0
0

Hello everyone,

 

In the search path of the CTM explanation tool, I see four messages.

Capture.PNG

First two are related to "Timely Demand fulfillment"

Capture1.PNG

And the next two are for "Late Demand fulfillment"

Capture2.PNG

I am not sure why CTM is giving two messages each for timely and late demand fulfillment. Is there any logic I am missing?

It should have been given only one for each timely and late demand filfillment.

 

Please note that the information in the first two messages are exactly the same. And same is the case with the next two messages.

↧

Background GATP based on LOAD Scheduling Step

July 9, 2014, 6:48 am
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

We work with an integrated solution between ECC and APO.

During the sales Order entry, the system triggers a Background GATP in order to calculate a first MAD Date.

It seems that during this Background GATP the system doesn't read on APO side the Load Scheduling step based on the Start Location and The Means of Transport. From the condition analysis, I noticed that the system doesn't read the field Means of Transport.

 

Capture.PNG

The only way that I found to solve this issue was to map in the APO Customizing ( GATP => Transportation and Shipment Scheduling  => Interfaces => Define assignment of Default Means of Transport to Shipping Conditions) The shipping condition to the means of Transport but this is only a one to one relation meaning that I cannot assign several MoT to the same Means of Transport.

 

Do you have any idea how can I try to manage that issue?

 

Thanks in advance for your input.

 

Kr,

JP

↧

Operation 003000000003, activity P: Minimum interval > Maximum interval

July 9, 2014, 7:39 am
$
0
0

Dear Seniors,

 

 

I encounter this error when I try to CIF the PDS in APO and I cannot pass it. I've tried to look up in different forums and the solutions that work there, don't work in my situation.

Transfer BOM & Routing to APO

I've checked my routing and I don't have defined any Wait time, Std. queue time or Std. move time.

 

If you have any idea regarding the cause of this error , please share.

 

Thank you,

↧
Viewing all 2068 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>