Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP Advanced Planning & Optimization (SAP APO)
Viewing all 2068 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Withdrawal qty wrong in APO forecast consumption (in case of partial delivery)

August 30, 2013, 9:59 am
$
0
0

Hi to everybody

 

our customer has

- R/3 4.7

- APO 4.1

 

We are migrating R/3 4.7 to ECC 6 and during test we face a problem in APO forecast consumption never occured before related to withdrawal qtys.

 

 

 

Scenario:

 

Step 1: we release from APO DP a forecast = 100 pcs

 

Step 2: we enter a sales order in ECC = 50 pcs

Forecast consumption works well: unconsumed forecast = 100 (planned qty) - 50 (qty allocated to the sales order) = 50

 

Step 3: we create a delivery for the sales order for a partial qty = 10

Forecast consumption works well: unconsumed forecast = 100 (planned qty) - 40 (qty allocated to the open sales order qty) - 10 (qty allocated to the delivery) = 50

 

Step 4: we do the Good Issue of the delivery

Here we have problems

 

Our expectation is

- withdrawal qty = 10

- unconsumed forecast = 50 = 100 (planned 1ty) - 40 (qty allocated to the open sales order qty) - 10 (withdrawal qty)

 

BUT result from RRP3 is different and wrong:

- withdrawal qty = 40 instead of 10 (it seems that it is set = open sales order qty instead to GI qty)

- unconsumed forecast = 20 = 100 (planned 1ty) - 40 (qty allocated to the open sales order qty) - 40 (withdrawal qty)

 

 

Does anyone know if there are some new setting in ECC6 that drive this type of behaviour?

Or anyone can give me some suggestion?

 

I've tried to check the consumption situation in database tables /sapapo/dp_head and /sapapo/dh_sched but they are empty...

 

Thanks in advance

Regards

Simona

↧
Search

GATP no confirmation

August 30, 2013, 8:16 am
$
0
0

Hello,

I´m testing a new planning book and I´m stuck testing GATP functionality.

I ´ve loaded quota and when I see the situation of product allocation in a sales order, I get the following result with no confirmation:

 

GATP-1..jpg

I´ve created the POS and the PA. The time series seems to be ok.

Do you have any idea of what´s the problem?

 

Cheers.

↧
↧

Objects for processing step 01 do not exist Message no. /SAPAPO/CDPSBATCH020

August 30, 2013, 12:57 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

when i run PP/DS run i get the below error despite the fact that all the masters exists and foreground run in rrp3 is also working...I made a big search on google to my dismay i find no clue ...can you  help me with some clue?

 

"

Objects for processing step 01 do not exist

Message no. /SAPAPO/CDPSBATCH020 "

 

 

thanks

↧

CIF INTEGRATION MODEL IS PARTIALLY ACTIVATED

August 31, 2013, 9:20 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

Here is an issue with CIF integration model. When we are trying to do IM active, we observed the two logs

1.activated

2.not activated.

final result is partially activated.

Due to this our daily cif job is failing.

 

Please help us to resolve the issue.

 

Thanks

Bans.

↧

APO SNP Location/Network Heuristics approach

August 29, 2013, 1:25 am
$
0
0

Hi All, Im wondering if anyone could share their experiences. Im working in a project trying to implement/exploring the option of using location/network heuristics. The approach im taking now is using the planning file and then based on low level codes run heuristics and execute batch jobs. Is there any better approach which you can share?

↧
↧

What is the difference between Characteristic Values and Key Figures in APO ?

August 29, 2013, 12:23 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Can you please clarify the concept of Charateristic values and Key Figure Values in APO.

 

Sorry for such a naive question but can you please explain this with some real life examples.

 

Regards,

Lokesh Sah.

↧

excess production is plannying by heuristics

July 2, 2013, 8:24 pm
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

We are facing a weired problem.

 

Heuristics is planning for excess production.

 

1. Total demand is 1300

2. Production planned in same bucket is 1310.

3. Production plan in the last bucket of the horizon is 10 units reduced.( total demand is 1200 and production planned is 1190).

4.Initial buckets demand is zero.

 

Below master data settings are checked.

 

1.Lot for Lot strategy.

2.Saftey stock days is zero and value is zero.

3. Scrap percentage in PDS is not maintained.

4. Rounding value is 10.

 

Request for your inputs and solution as we are unable to plan for monthly cycle.

 

Regards

Bans.

↧

What is Step- Down Matrix used in SNP

September 2, 2013, 4:06 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

 

 

What is the Stepdown Matrix concept used in  Raw Material Planning.

 

 

 

Regards

Harsh

↧
Search

Saving Multiple LUW's from SMQ2 to SMQ3

August 27, 2013, 7:11 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We are in a situation where we have hundreds of entries in the Inbound queue on SAP ERP that have been sent incorrectly from our SCM system. We would like to same these into SMQ3 for the time being but don't know how to save multiple LUW's.

 

Can anyone let us know if this is possible?

 

Thanks,

Mark

↧
↧

Avoiding back orders with the request delivery date on weekends

August 25, 2013, 10:46 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts


I would like to ask your support for an issue related to APO scheduling.

 

Recently, the operation team has requested a change in SAP to make the system able to acept sales orders with the request delivery date on weekends and holidays. (Just for your information, the operation here does not work 7 days a week, but eventually sales orders need to be shipped on weekends.)

 

However, since the system now accepts having the request delivery date being assigned to any of the 7 days of the week, when the back order job runs in the morning, SAP already assigns to the next day the request delivery date in the order - not considering if the next day is a weekend or holiday.

 

Since the carrier labels are printed based on the request delivery date, this situation can cause an issue in the operation when having deliveries being shipped on Monday with labels showing delivery date as Saturday, for example.

 

Case 1: Sales order created by Customer Service on Friday:
1. Customer service creates the order and assigns the Req. Delivery Date to Monday

2. Delivery is picked, packed and PGI on Friday.

3. Customer receives the goods on Monday - no issue.

 

Case 2: Back Order job runs on Friday morning:

1. The system allocates the stock and assigns the Req. Delivery Date to Saturday (next day)

2. Delivery is picked, packed and PGI on Friday

3. The delivery date assigned in the carrier label shows Saturday, but the Delivery will just be shipped to customer on Monday (working day).

 

How can we avoid having back orders with the request delivery date on weekends?

 

Kindly provide your inputs about this issue.

Thank you.

↧

ATP results not transferred to R/3

May 21, 2013, 3:09 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Currently we are facing an issue with the sales orders when Back order processing is triggered from APO system. We have the concept of main item, sub item and sub item is the one relevant for delivery. When back order processing is triggered from APO, standard program initially sets the sub item for deletion, then does a availability check and create the sub item back in the sales order. In some cases, it is not creating the sub items back so we are losing the delivery relevant item from the sales orders. We believe it happens when desired delivery date is not met but couldn't confirm.

 

Availability check rule is set to 'C' in R/3.

 

Kindly advise on this.

 

 

Regards,

Parthiban

↧

Mass upload of condition records into condition maintenance for Scheduling

August 28, 2013, 7:59 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I want to Upload mass upload to condition maintenance for Scheduling

Transaction : /SAPAPO/SCH_GCM OR /sapapo/gcm.

 

I tried to do the recording but as it is ALV based I cannot capture the values into the transaction.

 

Did any one get uploaded the values using different technicques..?

is there any FM which I can use..

 

Please help..

 

Thnak,s

↧

How to create materials on Vendor Location?

September 2, 2009, 7:40 am
$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I have cifed my Vendor as an APO location

 

I would like to CIF materials so they can be automatically created under this vendor location

 

Is it enough to CIF the Purchase info record for the material/vendor?

 

I have active model for PIR but my materials are not created under this vendor location

 

Thanks for your advice

 

EL

↧
↧

Creation of Planning Area in APO

April 24, 2009, 4:22 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

can anyone please let me know by which t-code can create a planning area in APO ??

Please also detail me, some steps on the same and on what are the prerequisite things that i need to create for the same.

 

 

Regards,

Prasad.

↧

PP/DS

September 3, 2012, 10:40 am
$
0
0

I hav transferred all players from R3 via PDS ……so now I have with me all players like  planned orders,basic master data like product ,location,…..now I hve to run the ppds hiuristics (planning procedure -4) after that the PPDS output ie planned order and its elements like operation,sub operation  has to be taken to cdpso (ds board) and scheduling has to be performed . I am using standard scheduling profile sap001 and ”  backward “planning direction.

 

                 This being my ultimate goal I have set all the players in rite positions and b4 i  kick in what  SPRO settings should I do under PPDS …..i wish you to be a coach and  step in with some directions to me   before I kick in

↧
Search

CIF INTEGRATION MODEL IS PARTIALLY ACTIVATED

August 31, 2013, 9:20 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

Here is an issue with CIF integration model. When we are trying to do IM active, we observed the two logs

1.activated

2.not activated.

final result is partially activated.

Due to this our daily cif job is failing.

 

Please help us to resolve the issue.

 

Thanks

Bans.

↧

/SAPAPO/CIF_DELTA3 to remove uapproved STO from comparison in CCR

September 4, 2013, 2:30 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Currently we are having one requirement from client.

 

There are TLB orders created using TLB in APO which the client does not want to be transferred directly to ECC.

 

The business first approves the STO and then send them to ECC.

However when we perform the CCR these orders are detected in CCR and there ia risk of these orders being deleted in APO or being sent to ECC due to human error.

 

we want to implement the BADI /SAPAPO/CIF_DELTA3 to ignore all unapproved orders from comparison to avoid any issues.

 

I have checked the methods available in the BADO however not sure which one to use for above requirement.

I have checked method RELEVANT_FOR_COMPARE_R3_PO which is closest in term of description however cannot find any table structure inside for comparison.

 

Need help to understand which method to implement to solve our purpose.

 

Thanks,

Sanjog

↧
↧

Creation not possible (Mapping for product xxxxx already exists xxxxx ) Message no. /SAPAPO/MAT059

August 27, 2013, 7:24 pm
$
0
0

Hi SCN Friends,

 

I would like to share the issue we faced with you.

 

We were facing CIF job facing issue regularly due to Creation not possible (Mapping for product xxxxx already exists xxxxx ) Message no. /SAPAPO/MAT059 and our APO CIF got blocked.

 

so we analyzed and find the solution.

 

Solution.

 

 

This issue comes due to chnages in the "long code print format" in R/3 side.

 

So ask you R/3 or PP Team to check the Old & new format for the Material.

 

Then in APO Side follow the below steps.

 

1. We have to delete old code for material.

2. login to APO and enter /n/WUF t-code. check where this material are used.

3. Enter /n/SAPAPO/CULL_RTO_DEL t-code to delete it's PDS.

4. Enter /n/sapapo/mat1 and select flag for deletion option from Product Manu

 

Refer attachments.

↧

Need to find BADI

September 1, 2013, 11:14 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am trying to find BADI or enhancement for transaction code

/n/sapapo/cdps0 requirement is whenever I change the resource of an order then it should automatically changes source of supply in the order according to the resource. Could you help me in getting enhancement or BADI?

 

Thanks and Regards,

Ganesh.

↧

PP/DS hiuristics

September 4, 2013, 8:33 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

There are an array of fields in product master each has its own dynamics but what are the key  fields that you experts  normally explore when things go wrong with PP/DS run .I would be happy to know what is the product master fields you would normally dissect and put under examination.

 

My goal is clear i want a run whose  result is similar to this

 

Picture 002.jpg

 

the  first round of run i had some kind of result saying "product hiuristic finished"

ph1.jpg

 

and in the second round it issues warning

 

ph.jpg

I want a  clear run and  is a subject of intense pondering .Would like to have your suggestions,ideas only and not the answers .

 

thanks

↧
Viewing all 2068 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>